What were your major obstacles?
One significant obstacle has been related to accurately framing what constitutes the creative economy. There is a strong temptation to broaden the definition to include sectors of the economy that, while having a connection to creativity, strain the credibility of the term “creative economy”. On the other hand, limiting the definition too narrowly artificially limits the impact of creativity on the economy. In the end, Creative Concord leaned towards a more conservative definition, which included the fine arts and creative enterprises. Another obstacle, which is ongoing, is breaking down the conceptual stereotypes that exist between artists and the private and public sectors. Artists sometimes mistakenly view conservatives and business people as enemies of public funding for the arts. (In New Hampshire this is patently inaccurate. Some of our most conservative governors provided the highest level of public funding for the arts). At the same time, many in the private sector do not understand how profoundly the arts and creativity contribute to the economy. There are also perceived cultural differences that appear to separate the stereotypical button- down business executive from the free-spirited creative type.
Who or what was instrumental in overcoming these obstacles?
An interesting observation is that almost everyone has a creative vein that manifests itself in music performance, dance, fine arts, etc. It seems we are all creative artists down deep; it’s just that not all of us earn our daily bread this way.
What top three suggestions would you give to others attempting a similar project?
Accurately frame what constitutes the creative economy; lean towards a more conservative definition of creative economy; break down stereotypes of private sector and the arts